Publication:
Compensation and Employment Policies in the U.S. Public Sector

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2017-04-27

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Research Data

Abstract

How do compensation and employment policies distinct to the public sector affect the quality of public services in the United States? I explore labor-market reactions to de-unionization, defined-benefit pensions, and statutory expenditure limits. I find that a Tennessee ban on collective bargaining in school districts modestly reduced both teacher compensation and student-teacher ratios, but had no significant effect on student test scores or per-pupil expenditure. Similarly, local referendums to override a tax and expenditure limit in Wisconsin prompted school-district administrators to decrease class sizes without altering teacher compensation. Parents responded by enrolling their children in funded schools. Lastly, I show that transitioning from a defined-benefit to a defined-contribution pension increased mid-career mobility among state employees in Michigan. Older workers were willing to remain an additional four years in government service to receive pension benefits worth twice their salary at separation. Younger workers did not persist to earn benefits equal to their final salary.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Economics, Labor

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories