Publication:
Efficiency and Cost of Primary Care by Nurses and Physician Assistants

Thumbnail Image

Date

1978-02-09

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Massachusetts Medical Society
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Greenfield, S, A.L. Komaroff, T.M. Pass, H. Anderson, and S. Nessim. 1978. "Efficiency and Cost of Primary Care by Nurses and Physician Assistants." New England Journal of Medicine.; 298(6):305-9. PMID: 23495.

Research Data

Abstract

We conducted a prospective study in a prepaid primary-care practice (health-maintenance organization) of a system in which nurses and physician assistants used protocols, and compared the efficiency and costs of this "new-health-practitioner" protocol system to a physician-only nonprotocol system. In five months, we studied 472 patients with any of four common acute complaints — respiratory infections, urinary and vaginal infections, headache, and abdominal pain; a subset of 203 patients was randomly allocated between the two systems. In the new-health-practitioner system physician time per patient was reduced by 92 per cent, from 11.8 to 0.9 minutes, and average visit costs — including practitioner time and charges for laboratory tests and medications — were 20 per cent less (P = 0.01). We conclude that this protocol system saves physician time and reduces costs. (N Engl J Med 298:305–309, 1978)

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

General Medicine

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories