Publication: Using Implementation Fidelity to Aid in Interpreting Program Impacts: A Brief Review
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2019-12
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Hill, Heather C., Anna Erickson. "Using Implementation Fidelity to Aid in Interpreting Program Impacts: A Brief Review." Educational Researcher 48, no. 9 (2019): 590-598. DOI: 10.3102/0013189x19891436
Research Data
Abstract
<jats:p> Poor program implementation constitutes one explanation for null results in trials of educational interventions. For this reason, researchers often collect data about implementation fidelity when conducting such trials. In this article, we document whether and how researchers report and measure program fidelity in recent cluster-randomized trials. We then create two measures—one describing the level of fidelity reported by authors and another describing whether the study reports null results—and examine the correspondence between the two. We also explore whether fidelity is influenced by study size, type of fidelity measured and reported, and features of the intervention. We find that as expected, fidelity level relates to student outcomes; we also find that the presence of new curriculum materials positively predicts fidelity level. </jats:p>
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service