Publication:

The Veiled Protector: A Study of Mahākāla’s Role in Presence, Protection, and Power Within Esoteric Buddhist Traditions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2026-06-05

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Zhai, Yunyao. 2026. The Veiled Protector: A Study of Mahākāla’s Role in Presence, Protection, and Power Within Esoteric Buddhist Traditions. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Abstract

This study examines the trajectory of Mahākāla, one of them most popular Buddhist protectors, from his earliest appearances in Buddhist textual sources to his elevation as the paramount protective deity of the Mongol Yuan empire in the thirteenth century. Drawing on Sanskrit, Tibetan, and Chinese sources spanning eight centuries, it asks how Buddhist traditions incorporated a figure of dangerous alterity without eliminating the very qualities that renders him visible and deployable, and what this process reveals about the mechanisms through which Buddhism manages powers they cannot afford to discard.

This study argues that Buddhist traditions do not reject or eliminate dangerous powers it encounters, as represented by Mahākāla, but approach them as a condition of possibility: ungoverned, such forces bind beings more tightly to saṃsāra; governed, they generate extraordinary efficacy and liberation. Mahākāla exemplifies this logic at an institutional scale: his violence is never denied or moralized away but disciplined and redirected through a succession of frameworks, each of which depends on the preservation of the very force it controls. It is this structural premise, the dissertation contends, that operates both at the level of doctrine and at the level of institutional history. The deity who comes to preside over the most powerful empire of the premodern world was never fully tamed, and ultimately, the tradition that enables his deployment carried within its own soteriological logic the recognition that no worldly protection is sufficient.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Religion, South Asian studies, History

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories