Publication:

Treatment of missing data determined conclusions regarding moralizing gods

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2021-07-07

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Beheim, Bret, Quentin D. Atkinson, Joseph Bulbulia, Will Gervais, Russell D. Gray, Joseph Henrich, Martin Lang et al. "Treatment of missing data determined conclusions regarding moralizing gods." Nature 595, no. 7866 (2021): E29-E34. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03655-4

Abstract

Whitehouse, et al.1 have recently used the Seshat archaeo-historical databank2 to argue that beliefs in moralizing gods appear in world history only after the formation of complex “megasocieties” of 30 around one million people. Inspection of the authors’ data, however, shows that 61% of Seshat data points on moralizing gods are missing values, mostly from smaller populations below one million people, and during the analysis the authors re-coded these data points to signify the absence of moralizing gods beliefs. When we confine the analysis only to the extant data or use various standard imputation methods, the reported finding is reversed: moralizing gods precede increases in social complexity. We suggest that the reported “megasociety threshold” for the emergence of moralizing gods is thus solely a consequence of the decision to re-code nearly two-thirds of Seshat data from unknown values to known absences of moralizing go

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Multidisciplinary

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories