Publication:
Artificial Humanities: A Literary Perspective on Creating and Enhancing Humans from Pygmalion to Cyborgs

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2020-09-11

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Beguš, Nina. 2020. Artificial Humanities: A Literary Perspective on Creating and Enhancing Humans from Pygmalion to Cyborgs. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.

Research Data

Abstract

This dissertation explores boundaries and relationships between humans and humanlike artificial entities in the twentieth-century and contemporary literature. The central question, What is human?, is posed in relation to the newest and speculated developments in the fields of artificial intelligence, social robotics, neurotechnology, and assisted reproduction technologies including gene editing. I focus on three major and related topics extensively thematized in Western fiction (American, British, Irish), and less so in Eastern European fiction (Czech, Slovenian, and Serbian). Chapters 1 and 2 introduce posthuman language as used by humans, artificial intelligence, and nonhuman animals; chapters 3 and 4 examine pygmalionism and paralysis from medical and social perspectives; and the final two chapters evaluate assisted reproduction in terms of posthumanist biology. The main argument of the dissertation is that although the questions and definitions of the human are, unbeknown to scientists and engineers, now formed and framed in STEM fields, literature suggests solutions to philosophical questions pertaining to new technologies and offers a level of insight inaccessible to quantitative science. The dissertation proposes a new framework of artificial humanities where investigation of philosophical questions pertaining the human, nature, and technology occurs alongside cutting-edge science, technology, and engineering. The theoretical argument proposes that, despite recent claims of ontological posthumanism, scientific evolution still embraces the human and anthropocentrism.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

artificial intelligence, bioengineering, comparative literature, English literature, ethics, philosophy of science, Comparative literature

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories