Publication: Gas pile-up, gap overflow and Type 1.5 migration in circumbinary discs: general theory
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2012
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Oxford University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Kocsis, Bence, Zoltán Haiman, and Abraham Loeb. 2012. “Gas Pile-Up, Gap Overflow and Type 1.5 Migration in Circumbinary Discs: General Theory.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 427 (3): 2660–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22129.x.
Research Data
Abstract
Many astrophysical binaries, from planets to black holes, exert strong torques on their circumbinary accretion discs, and are expected to significantly modify the disc structure. Despite the several decade long history of the subject, the joint evolution of the binary + disc system has not been modelled with self-consistent assumptions for arbitrary mass ratios and accretion rates. Here, we solve the coupled binarydisc evolution equations analytically in the strongly perturbed limit, treating the azimuthally averaged angular momentum exchange between the disc and the binary and the modifications to the density, scaleheight, and viscosity self-consistently, including viscous and tidal heating, diffusion limited cooling, radiation pressure and the orbital decay of the binary. We find a solution with a central cavity and a migration rate similar to those previously obtained for Type II migration, applicable for large masses and binary separations, and near-equal mass ratios. However, we identify a distinct new regime, applicable at smaller separations and masses, and mass ratio in the range 10-3 ? q ? 0.1. For these systems, gas piles up outside the binary's orbit, but rather than creating a cavity, it continuously overflows as in a porous dam. The disc profile is intermediate between a weakly perturbed disc (producing Type I migration) and a disc with a gap (with Type II migration). However, the migration rate of the secondary is typically slower than both Type I and Type II rates. We term this new regime Type 1.5 migration.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service