Publication:

On Query-to-Communication Lifting for Adversary Bounds

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2020-12-07

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

ACM
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Anurag Anshu, Shalev Ben-David, and Srijita Kundu. 2021. On query-to-communication lifting for adversary bounds. In Proceedings of the 36th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC '21). Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, DEU, Article lipics, 1. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2021.30

Abstract

We investigate query-to-communication lifting theorems for models related to the quantum adversary bounds. Our results are as follows:

  1. We show that the classical adversary bound lifts to a lower bound on randomized communication complexity with a constant-sized gadget. We also show that the classical adversary bound is a strictly stronger lower bound technique than the previously-lifted measure known as critical block sensitivity, making our lifting theorem one of the strongest lifting theorems for randomized communication complexity using a constant-sized gadget.
  2. Turning to quantum models, we show a connection between lifting theorems for quantum adversary bounds and secure 2-party quantum computation in a certain "honest-but-curious" model. Under the assumption that such secure 2-party computation is impossible, we show that a simplified version of the positive-weight adversary bound lifts to a quantum communication lower bound using a constant-sized gadget. We also give an unconditional lifting theorem which lower bounds bounded-round quantum communication protocols.
  3. Finally, we give some new results in query complexity. We show that the classical adversary and the positive-weight quantum adversary are quadratically related. We also show that the positive-weight quantum adversary is never larger than the square of the approximate degree. Both relations hold even for partial functions.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories