Publication:

Types of dietary fat and breast cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2001

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Smith-Warner, Stephanie A., Donna Spiegelman, Hans-Olov Adami, W. Lawrence Beeson, Piet A. van den Brandt, Aaron R. Folsom, Gary E. Fraser, et al. 2001. “Types of Dietary Fat and Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Cohort Studies.” International Journal of Cancer 92 (5): 767–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0215(20010601)92:5<767::aid-ijc1247>3.0.co;2-0.

Abstract

Recently, there has been interest in whether intakes of specific types of fat are associated with breast cancer risk independently of other types of fat, but results have been inconsistent. We identified 8 prospective studies that met predefined criteria and analyzed their primary data using a standardized approach. Holding total energy intake constant, we calculated relative risks for increments of 5% of energy for each type of fat compared with an equivalent amount of energy from carbohydrates or from other types of fat. We combined study-specific relative risks using a random effects model, In the pooled database, 7,329 incident invasive breast cancer cases occurred among 351,821 women. The pooled relative risks (95% confidence intervals [Cl]) for an increment of 5% of energy were 1.09 (1.00-1.19) for saturated, 0.93 (0.84-1.03) for monounsaturated and 1.05 (0.96-1.16) for polyunsaturated fat compared with equivalent energy intake from carbohydrates, For a 5% of energy increment, the relative risks were 1.18 (95% Cl 0.99-1.42) for substituting saturated for monounsaturated fat, 0.98 (95% CI 0.85-1.12) for substituting saturated for polyunsaturated fat and 0.87 (95% Cl 0.73- 1.02) for substituting monounsaturated for polyunsaturated fat, No associations were observed for animal or vegetable fat intakes. These associations were not modified by menopausal status. These data are suggestive of only a weak positive association with substitution of saturated fat for carbohydrate consumption; none of the other types of fat examined was significantly associated with breast cancer risk relative to an equivalent reduction in carbohydrate consumption,

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories