Publication: Recycling Flexible Polyurethane Foam via Chemical Recovery Versus Incineration for Energy: A Comparison of Environmental and Economic Impacts
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
2020-09-18
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
McKay, Thomas. 2019. Recycling Flexible Polyurethane Foam via Chemical Recovery Versus Incineration for Energy: A Comparison of Environmental and Economic Impacts. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School.
Research Data
Abstract
A comparative life cycle analysis and economic analysis for recycling options for flexible polyurethane foam was developed. A novel glycolysis process, utilizing crude glycerol (a by product of biodiesel production) as a glycolysis agent was compared to incineration in an MSW WtE facility. The glycolysis process recovered valuable chemicals which can be used to manufacture polyurethane foams again while the incineration process generated electricity and steam. The glycolysis process performed well in the LCIA and economic analysis.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Life cycle assessment, glycolysis, waste to energy, incineration, polyurethane, flexible foam
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service