Evidence Based Public Policy Making: A Comparative Case Study Analysis

Abstract

Evidence Based Public Policy, widely referred to as EBPM, is a popular framework adopted by governments to forward legislation informed by robust evidence. Intuitively, the use of unbiased, accurate information seems to be an assumption for crafting quality policies today. However, obstacles such as the means through which such information is collected, the nature of data and information, and translating these findings into policies marr the path to sound policy development. This report examines previous policies implemented in Washington State of the United States, federal United States, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and Canada to conduct a comparative case study analysis on challenges overcome, measures taken to succeed, and key takeaways for the Japanese government. Furthermore, interviews with experts in relevant fields glean insights into the nuances of translating evidence to policy work. Valuable understandings are created through these case studies, including the usage of tailored approaches, data-driven decision-making, and public involvement for successful policymaking in varied circumstances.