DASH
Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Browse DASH
DASH Stories
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Harvard Division of Continuing Education
  3. DCE Theses and Dissertations
  4. Ending the Stalemate: Iran, the United States, and the Use of Applied History to Facilitate Changes in Diplomacy

Ending the Stalemate: Iran, the United States, and the Use of Applied History to Facilitate Changes in Diplomacy

Open/View files
Bell_Blake_Thesis_Feb2026.pdf (3.11 MB)
Date
January 6, 2026
Author(s)
Bell , Blake
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Bell , Blake . 2026. Ending the Stalemate: Iran, the United States, and the Use of Applied History to Facilitate Changes in Diplomacy. Masters Thesis, Harvard University Division of Continuing Education.
Abstract
This thesis explores the complex and adversarial relationship between the U.S. and Iran since 1979, including the impacts of sanctions, Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons, regime change efforts, and alliances aimed at cooperation in the Middle East. Examining historical parallels highlights how applied history can inform diplomatic strategies. Sanctions, the primary U.S. approach toward Iran, have largely failed to influence Iranian policies and have caused significant negative effects. Historical examples, such as sanctions against Fascist Italy, reveal ineffectiveness in changing aggressive behavior. I suggest the Peace of Westphalia from 1648 as a model for creating a balanced Middle Eastern order involving major powers to reduce sectarian tensions and promote cooperation. Iran's nuclear program is crucial for its national security as a deterrent, and although Iran has not yet weaponized its capabilities, it is nearing threshold status. Therefore, I propose that Iran could use nuclear weapons to negotiate for sanctions relief, similar to South Africa's experience with its nuclear program. I also argue that political change in Iran should not rely on external military intervention, as past U.S. efforts in Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan led to prolonged instability. The recommendation is that the U.S. avoid consideration of regime change as a strategy and focus on diplomatic engagement, learning from past mistakes. Analyzing historical cases reveals that a diplomatic approach with realistic negotiations offers the best path to regional stability, encouraging cooperation and mutual recognition to foster peace in the Middle East. Both nations should study history to avoid repeating errors, as understanding past conflicts helps clarify regional and ideological dynamics.
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service
URI
https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/42725022
Subjects

Applied History

Iran

United States

Political science

International relatio...

Collection
DCE Theses and Dissertations
Metrics
Repository logo
  • CONTACT US
  • OSRDS
  • ABOUT DASH
  • DEPOSITING TO DASH
  • TERMS OF USE
  • REQUEST A WAIVER
  • TAKE DOWN POLICY
  • NAME CHANGE POLICY
  • HARVARD OA POLICIES
  • DASH SUBMITTER AGREEMENT
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
Creative Commons License BY
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which allows anyone to share and adapt our material as long as proper attribution is given.
For details and exceptions, see the Harvard Library Copyright Policy
©2024 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.