Publication: Enrollee Mix, Treatment Intensity, and Cost in Competing Indemnity and HMO Plans
Loading...
Open/View Files
Date
2003
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Cutler, David M., Daniel Altman, and Richard J. Zeckhauser. 2003. Enrollee mix, treatment intensity, and cost in competing indemnity and HMO Plans. Journal of Health Economics 22(1): 23-45.
Abstract
Why do indemnity insurance plans cost substantially more per capita—77% more in our study—than HMOs? We answer this question using data from a large organization’s insurance pool, covering 215,000 lives. We decompose cost differences for eight major medical conditions into four sources: demographics, incidence within demographic groups, treatment intensity, and prices per service. Greater incidence of disease in the indemnity plan (both from demographics themselves and within demographic groups) and higher prices each explain nearly 50% of the difference. Contrary to conventional wisdom, indemnity plans do not have greater treatment intensity.
Description
Research Data
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service