Publication: The Normativity of Instrumental Reason
Date
2008
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Oxford University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2008. The normativity of instrumental reason. In The Constitution of Agency, 26-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Originally published in Garrett Cullity and Berys Gaut, eds., Ethics and Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
Research Data
Abstract
Most philosophers think it uncontroversial that practical reason requires us to take the means to our ends, but have been silent about the normative foundation of this requirement. The interesting question, almost everyone agrees, is whether practical reason requires anything more, such as a principle of morality or prudence. This chapter examines the question what makes instrumental reason normative. It articulates the answers implicit in the rationalist and empiricist traditions, criticizing the former for its inability to explain how we can be motivated by the instrumental principle, and the latter for its inability to explain how we can be guided by it. It argues that the normativity of instrumental reason, like that of moral reason, must be grounded in the agent's autonomy, and also that there can be no requirement to take the means to our ends unless there are also required ends.
Description
Keywords
intrumental reason, categorical imperative, rationalist, normativity, Kant, Hume, empiricist, desire, autonomy
Terms of Use
Metadata Only