Publication: Ambivalence About Equality in the United States or, Did Tocqueville Get it Wrong and Why Does that Matter?
Open/View Files
Date
2006
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Verlag
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Hochschild, Jennifer L. 2006. Ambivalence about equality in the United States or, did Tocqueville get it wrong and why does that matter? Social Justice Research 19(1): 43-62.
Research Data
Abstract
Alexis de Tocqueville believed that “democratic peoples’... passion for equality is ardent, insatiable, eternal, and invincible.” This article examines whether and under what conditions residents of the United States demonstrate such a commitment to equality. I show that at many points in history, Americans have indeed chosen to move toward greater justice and less oppression; however, there are clear limits to their passion for equality. White Americans endorse less social, political, and economic equality than do African Americans, but even the latter often resist equality for groups that they perceive to be threats, or for behaviors that threaten strong social or moral norms. The article discusses implications for political activists of these patterns of support for and resistance to greater equality, and suggests strategies for overcoming oppression and promoting justice.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
equality, de Tocqueville, public opinion surveys, race, group boundaries, redistribution, social norms
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service