Publication:

Visual Mental Imagery and Visual Perception: Structural Equivalence Revealed by Scanning Processes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2008

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Psychonomic Society
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Borst, Gregoire, and Stephen M. Kosslyn. 2008. Visual mental imagery and visual perception: structural equivalence revealed by scanning processes. Memory & Cognition 36, no. 4: 849-862.

Abstract

The research reported in the present article investigates whether information is represented the same way in both visual mental imagery and the early phases of visual perception. In Experiment 1, the same participants scanned over patterns of dots in a mental image (with images based on a just-seen pattern), during perception, and in an iconic image. The time to scan increasing distances increased at comparable rates in the three tasks. However, in Experiment 2, when mental images were created from information stored in long-term memory, participants scanned more slowly in the mental image condition. Nevertheless, the rates of scanning in the perceptual tasks were highly correlated with the rates of scanning in the imagery tasks in both experiments. The results provide evidence that mental images and perceived stimuli are represented similarly and can be processed in the same way.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories

Story
Visual Mental Imagery and Visual Perception:… : DASH Story 2015-08-10
As I am currently writing my extended essay (for the International Baccalaureate Program) on mental toughness, its components, and trainability, I was looking into visualisation and imagery. From here I looked into the neurobiological aspects of both, and the correlations between the two in respect to the shared brain areas and the similarities between the two. This brilliant study allowed me to connect the two, even though they were being applied in different fields. Many thanks.