Publication: Why Long Horizons? A Study of Power Against Persistent Alternatives
Loading...
Open/View Files
Date
2001
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Campbell, John Y. 2001. Why long horizons? A study of power against persistent alternatives. Journal of Empirical Finance 8, no. 5: 459-491.
Abstract
This paper studies tests of predictability in regressions with a given AR(1) regressor and an asset return dependent variable measured over a short or long horizon. The paper shows that when there is a persistent predictable component in the return, an increase in the horizon may increase the R2 statistic of the regression and the approximate slope of a predictability test. Monte Carlo experiments show that long-horizon regression tests have serious size distortions when asymptotic critical values are used, but some versions of such tests have power advantages remaining after size is corrected.
Description
Other Available Sources
Research Data
Keywords
long-horizon regressions, power, approximate slope
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service