Publication:

Why Long Horizons? A Study of Power Against Persistent Alternatives

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2001

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Campbell, John Y. 2001. Why long horizons? A study of power against persistent alternatives. Journal of Empirical Finance 8, no. 5: 459-491.

Abstract

This paper studies tests of predictability in regressions with a given AR(1) regressor and an asset return dependent variable measured over a short or long horizon. The paper shows that when there is a persistent predictable component in the return, an increase in the horizon may increase the R2 statistic of the regression and the approximate slope of a predictability test. Monte Carlo experiments show that long-horizon regression tests have serious size distortions when asymptotic critical values are used, but some versions of such tests have power advantages remaining after size is corrected.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

long-horizon regressions, power, approximate slope

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories