Publication:
Measuring Trust

Thumbnail Image

Date

2000

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MIT Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Glaeser, Edward, David Laibson, Jose Scheinkman, and Christine Soutter. 2000. Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 811-846.

Research Data

Abstract

We combine two experiments and a survey to measure trust and trustworthiness—two key components of social capital. Standard attitudinal survey questions about trust predict trustworthy behavior in our experiments much better than they predict trusting behavior. Trusting behavior in the experiments is predicted by past trusting behavior outside of the experiments. When individuals are closer socially, both trust and trustworthiness rise. Trustworthiness declines when partners are of different races or nationalities. High status individuals are able to elicit more trustworthiness in others.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories

Story
Measuring Trust… : DASH Story 2013-11-02
I am a professor at a university in Romania, South East Europe. I am a sociologist and teaches courses in research methodology. I'm working on a research about measuring trust in public institutions. Thanks.
Story
Measuring Trust… : DASH Story 2014-10-20
Thanks to Open Access I could read an article needed for the class. I'm really glad that it allowed me to do it legally and free of charge. It's really annoying when studying that some articles are just unreachable, mostly because they're too expensive to me (e.g. 30$/per one). Thank you DASH
Story
Measuring Trust… : DASH Story 2015-08-21
As a student, having to pay $35 or $40 per article acquisition from publishing companies is prohibitively expensive and jeopardizes the flow of information that is so critical to current research today. It also is regressive and penalizes the poorer members of our society who are most in need of higher education to help advance not just their careers but their lives.