Publication:
Global 3-D Model Analysis of the Seasonal Cycle of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide: Implications for Terrestrial Vegetation Uptake

Thumbnail Image

Date

2008

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Geophysical Union
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Suntharalingam, Parvadha, A.J. Kettle, S.M. Montzka, and Daniel J. Jacob. 2008. Global 3-D model analysis of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: Implications for vegetation uptake. Geophysical Research Letters 35(L19801): 1-6.

Research Data

Abstract

We use a global 3-D simulation of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) to interpret observations at a network of surface sites. We aim to identify the primary factors underlying observed seasonal variations and to constrain COS uptake by terrestrial vegetation. Model simulations are based on a recent estimate of global COS fluxes, with closure between sources and sinks. We find that the dominant influences on seasonal variation of COS are terrestrial vegetation uptake in the northern extratropics, and ocean fluxes in the southern extratropics. Simulations underestimate the amplitude of the observed seasonal cycle in the northern hemisphere, particularly at terrestrial sites, indicating that COS uptake by terrestrial vegetation has been underestimated in recent budgets. Fitting the observed seasonal variation at northern hemisphere sites in the model requires a doubling of the global vegetation sink to ∼490 Gg S y−1, while fitting the southern hemisphere data suggests a reduction of ∼50 Gg S y−1 in the southern extratropical ocean source. Balancing these changes in COS fluxes requires an additional source (∼235 Gg S y−1, equivalent to 40% of identified sources) missing from present budget estimates. Discrepancies between annual mean observations and simulated concentrations, derived from our best estimates of seasonal fluxes, are largest in the tropics, suggesting an underestimate of COS sources at these latitudes.

Description

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories