Publication:
When Analysis Fails: Heuristic Mechanism Design via Self-Correcting Procedures

Thumbnail Image

Date

2009

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Verlag
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Parkes, David C. 2009. When Analysis Fails: Heuristic Mechanism Design via Self-Correcting Procedures. For an invited talk given at the 35th International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM’09), January 24-30, Czech Republic.

Research Data

Abstract

Computational mechanism design (CMD) seeks to understand how to design game forms that induce desirable outcomes in multi-agent systems despite private information, self-interest and limited computational resources. CMD finds application in many settings, in the public sector for wireless spectrum and airport landing rights, to Internet advertising, to expressive sourcing in the supply chain, to allocating computational resources. In meeting the demands for CMD in these rich domains, we often need to bridge from the theory of economic mechanism design to the practice of deployable, computational mechanisms. A compelling example of this need arises in dynamic combinatorial environments, where classic analytic approaches fail and heuristic, computational approaches are required. In this talk I outline the direction of self-correcting mechanisms, which dynamically modify decisions via “output ironing" to ensure truthfulness and provide a fully computational approach to mechanism design. For an application, I suggest heuristic mechanisms for dynamic auctions in which bids arrive over time and supply may also be uncertain.

Description

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories