Publication:

Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2001

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Campbell, John Y., Martin Lettau, Burton G. Malkiel, and Yexiao Xu. 2001. Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Finance 56(1): 1-43.

Abstract

This paper uses a disaggregated approach to study the volatility of common stocks at the market, industry, and firm levels. Over the period from 1962 to 1997 there has been a noticeable increase in firm-level volatility relative to market volatility. Accordingly, correlations among individual stocks and the explanatory power of the market model for a typical stock have declined, whereas the number of stocks needed to achieve a given level of diversification has increased. All the volatility measures move together countercyclically and help to predict GDP growth. Market volatility tends to lead the other volatility series. Factors that may be responsible for these findings are suggested. The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

market model, industry volatility, market volatility, idiosyncratic volatility, business cycles, diversification

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories