Publication: Deconstructing, Reconstructing, Preserving Paul E Meehl's Legacy of Construct Validity
Date
2005
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Psychological Association
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Maher, Brendan A., and Irving I. Gottesman. 2005. Deconstructing, reconstructing, preserving Paul E Meehl's legacy of construct validity. Psychological Assessment 17 (4): 415-422.
Research Data
Abstract
The question of the status of cause-and-effect explanations of human behavior that posit physically existing causative factors and those that, on the other hand, posit hypothetical entities in the form of "useful fictions" has a long history. The influence of the works of Jeremy Bentham and Hans Vaihinger, as well as the later influence of Francis Galton, is described. Issues of the validity of hypothetical constructs and related problems of measurement and definition as found in psychoanalytic theory construction and in trait theory are examined. The significant and continuing interest generated by the landmark studies of K. MacCorquodale and P. E. Meehl (1948) and L. J. Cronbach and P. E. Meehl (1955) as well as the central importance of P. E. Meehl's thinking are described.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
history of science, philosophy of science, construct validity
Terms of Use
Metadata Only