Publication: Burdens of Proof in Civil Litigation: An Economic Perspective
Loading...
Open/View Files
Date
1997
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Bruce L. Hay & Kathryn E. Spier, Burdens of Proof in Civil Litigation: An Economic Perspective, 26 J. Legal Stud. 413 (1997).
Abstract
Burden of proof rules, which require a specified party to produce evidence on a contested issue, are central to the adversary system. In this article, we model burden of proof rules as a device for minimizing the costs of litigation. The central point to emerge from the model is that, properly assigned, a burden of proof rule economizes on the transmission of information to the court. We use the model to explain characteristic practices of courts in assigning the burden of proof.
Description
Other Available Sources
Research Data
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service