Publication: A Case Study in Ad Hominem Arguments: Fichte's Science of Knowledge
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
1990
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Penn State University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Suber, Peter. 1990. A case study in ad hominem arguments: Fichte's science of knowledge. Philosophy and Rhetoric 23(1): 12-42.
Research Data
Abstract
Fichte's narrative persona in the Science of Knowledge is obnoxious. I try to disentangle regrettable signs of immaturity and paranoia from justifiable ad hominem arguments. Many of Fichte's ad hominem attacks on metaphysical realists are justified by his metaphysics and epistemology. We cannot criticize an important class of these arguments unless we criticize his epistemology and metaphysics. They are not matters of "style" separable from "substance". I show this inseparability, and point out a few inconsistencies, but otherwise do not comment on Fichte's "substance".
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
philosophy
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service