Publication:
Verbal Autopsy Methods with Multiple Causes

Thumbnail Image

Date

2008

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Institute of Mathematical Statistics
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

King, Gary, and Ying Lu. 2008. Verbal autopsy methods with multiple causes. Statistical Science 23(1): 78-91.

Research Data

Abstract

Verbal autopsy procedures are widely used for estimating cause- specific mortality in areas without medical death certification. Data on symp- toms reported by caregivers along with the cause of death are collected from a medical facility, and the cause-of-death distribution is estimated in the pop- ulation where only symptom data are available. Current approaches analyze only one cause at a time, involve assumptions judged difficult or impossible to satisfy, and require expensive, time-consuming, or unreliable physician re- views, expert algorithms, or parametric statistical models. By generalizing current approaches to analyze multiple causes, we show how most of the dif- ficult assumptions underlying existing methods can be dropped. These gen- eralizations also make physician review, expert algorithms and parametric statistical assumptions unnecessary. With theoretical results, and empirical analyses in data from China and Tanzania, we illustrate the accuracy of this approach. While no method of analyzing verbal autopsy data, including the more computationally intensive approach offered here, can give accurate es- timates in all circumstances, the procedure offered is conceptually simpler, less expensive, more general, as or more replicable, and easier to use in prac- tice than existing approaches. We also show how our focus on estimating aggregate proportions, which are the quantities of primary interest in verbal autopsy studies, may also greatly reduce the assumptions necessary for, and thus improve the performance of, many individual classifiers in this and other areas. As a companion to this paper, we also offer easy-to-use software that implements the methods discussed herein.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

verbal autopsy, cause-specific mortality, cause of death, survey research, classification, sensitivity, specificity

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories