Publication: Exclusivist Republicanism and the Non-Monarchical Republic
Loading...
Date
2010
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SAGE Publications
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
James Hankins, 2010. Exclusivist republicanism and the non-monarchical republic. Political Theory 38(4): 452-482.
Abstract
The idea that a republic is the only legitimate form of government and that non-elective monarchy and hereditary political privileges are by definition illegitimate is an artifact of late eighteenth century republicanism, though it has roots in the “godly republics” of the seventeenth century. It presupposes understanding a republic (respublica) to be a non-monarchical form of government. The latter definition is a discursive practice that goes back only to the fifteenth century and is not found in Roman or medieval sources. This article explains how the definition emerged in Renaissance Italy.
Description
Other Available Sources
Research Data
Keywords
monarchy, tyranny, constitutions, legitimacy, republic
Terms of Use
Metadata Only