Publication: Faithfulness in Internet Algorithms
Open/View Files
Date
2004
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Shneidman, Jeffrey, David C. Parkes, and Laurent Massoulie. 2004. Faithfulness in internet algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on practice and theory of incentives in networked systems: September 3, 2004, Portland, Oregon, ed. D. Katabi, R. Sami, ACM Digital Library, Association for Computing Machinery, and Special Interest Group on Data Communications, 220-227. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press. http://portal.acm.org/toc.cfm?id=1016527.
Research Data
Abstract
Proving or disproving faithfulness (a property describing robustness to rational manipulation in action as well as information revelation) is an appealing goal when reasoning about distributed systems containing rational participants. Recent work formalizes the notion of faithfulness and its foundation properties, and presents a general proof technique in the course of proving the ex post Nash faithfulness of a theoretical routing problem [11].In this paper, we use a less formal approach and take some first steps in faithfulness analysis for existing algorithms running on the Internet. To this end, we consider the expected faithfulness of BitTorrent, a popular file download system, and show how manual backtracing (similar to the the ideas behind program slicing [22]) can be used to find rational manipulation problems. Although this primitive technique has serious drawbacks, it can be useful in disproving faithfulness.Building provably faithful Internet protocols and their corresponding specifications can be quite difficult depending on the system knowledge assumptions and problem complexity. We present some of the open problems that are associated with these challenges.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
backtracing, computational failure models, computational mechanism design, distributed algorithmic mechanism design, faithfulness, program slicing, rational failure, rational manipulation
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service