Publication:
Faithfulness in Internet Algorithms

Thumbnail Image

Date

2004

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Shneidman, Jeffrey, David C. Parkes, and Laurent Massoulie. 2004. Faithfulness in internet algorithms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on practice and theory of incentives in networked systems: September 3, 2004, Portland, Oregon, ed. D. Katabi, R. Sami, ACM Digital Library, Association for Computing Machinery, and Special Interest Group on Data Communications, 220-227. New York, N.Y.: ACM Press. http://portal.acm.org/toc.cfm?id=1016527.

Research Data

Abstract

Proving or disproving faithfulness (a property describing robustness to rational manipulation in action as well as information revelation) is an appealing goal when reasoning about distributed systems containing rational participants. Recent work formalizes the notion of faithfulness and its foundation properties, and presents a general proof technique in the course of proving the ex post Nash faithfulness of a theoretical routing problem [11].In this paper, we use a less formal approach and take some first steps in faithfulness analysis for existing algorithms running on the Internet. To this end, we consider the expected faithfulness of BitTorrent, a popular file download system, and show how manual backtracing (similar to the the ideas behind program slicing [22]) can be used to find rational manipulation problems. Although this primitive technique has serious drawbacks, it can be useful in disproving faithfulness.Building provably faithful Internet protocols and their corresponding specifications can be quite difficult depending on the system knowledge assumptions and problem complexity. We present some of the open problems that are associated with these challenges.

Description

Keywords

backtracing, computational failure models, computational mechanism design, distributed algorithmic mechanism design, faithfulness, program slicing, rational failure, rational manipulation

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories