Publication:
From Decades to Epochs: Spanning the Gap between Geodesy and Structural Geology of Active Mountain Belts

Thumbnail Image

Date

2009

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Allmendinger, Richard W., John P. Loveless, Matthew E. Pritchard, and Brendan J. Meade. 2009. From decades to epochs: Spanning the gap between geodesy and structural geology of active mountain belts. Journal of Structural Geology 31(11): 1409-1422.

Research Data

Abstract

Geodetic data from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and from satellite interferometric radar (InSAR) are revolutionizing how we look at instantaneous tectonic deformation, but the significance for long-term finite strain in orogenic belts is less clear. We review two different ways of analyzing geodetic data: velocity gradient fields from which one can extract strain, dilatation, and rotation rate, and elastic block modeling, which assumes that deformation is not continuous but occurs primarily on networks of interconnected faults separating quasi-rigid blocks. These methods are complementary: velocity gradients are purely kinematic and yield information about regional deformation; the calculation does not take into account either faults or rigid blocks but, where GNSS data are dense enough, active fault zones and stable blocks emerge naturally in the solution. Block modeling integrates known structural geometry with idealized earthquake cycle models to predict slip rates on active faults. Future technological advances should overcome many of today's uncertainties and provide rich new data to mine by providing denser, more uniform, and temporally continuous observations.

Description

Keywords

Geodesy, GPS, Active tectonics

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories