Publication:

Linear combinations of docking affinities explain quantitative differences in RTK signaling

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2009

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Gordus, Andrew, Jordan A. Krall, Elsa M. Beyer, Alexis Kaushansky, Alejandro Wolf-Yadlin, Mark Sevecka, Bryan H. Chang, John Rush, and Gavin MacBeath. 2009. Linear combinations of docking affinities explain quantitative differences in RTK signaling. Molecular Systems Biology 5:235.

Abstract

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) process extracellular cues by activating a broad array of signaling proteins. Paradoxically, they often use the same proteins to elicit diverse and even opposing phenotypic responses. Binary, ‘on–off' wiring diagrams are therefore inadequate to explain their differences. Here, we show that when six diverse RTKs are placed in the same cellular background, they activate many of the same proteins, but to different quantitative degrees. Additionally, we find that the relative phosphorylation levels of upstream signaling proteins can be accurately predicted using linear models that rely on combinations of receptor-docking affinities and that the docking sites for phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and Shc1 provide much of the predictive information. In contrast, we find that the phosphorylation levels of downstream proteins cannot be predicted using linear models. Taken together, these results show that information processing by RTKs can be segmented into discrete upstream and downstream steps, suggesting that the challenging task of constructing mathematical models of RTK signaling can be parsed into separate and more manageable layers.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories