Publication:

An Axiomatic Characterization of Continuous-Outcome Market Makers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2010

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Verlag
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Gao, Xi Alice and Yiling Chen. 2010. An axiomatic characterization of continuous-outcome market makers. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on internet and network economics, ed. Amin Saberi, 505-514. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6484.

Abstract

Most existing market maker mechanisms for prediction markets are designed for events with a finite number of outcomes. All known attempts on designing market makers for forecasting continuous-outcome events resulted in mechanisms with undesirable properties. In this paper, we take an axiomatic approach to study whether it is possible for continuous-outcome market makers to satisfy certain desirable properties simultaneously. We define a general class of continuous-outcome market makers, which allows traders to express their information on any continuous subspace of their choice. We characterize desirable properties of these market makers using formal axioms. Our main result is an impossibility theorem showing that if a market maker offers binary-payoff contracts, either the market maker has unbounded worst case loss or the contract prices will stop being responsive, making future trades no longer profitable. In addition, we analyze a mechanism that does not belong to our framework. This mechanism has a worst case loss linear in the number of submitted orders, but encourages some undesirable strategic behavior.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

prediction markets, continuous-outcome events, combinatorial prediction markets, expressive betting

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories