Publication:

A Randomized Trial Assessing the Clinical Efficacy and Microbial Eradication of 1% Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution vs Tobramycin in Adult and Pediatric Subjects with Bacterial Conjunctivitis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2007

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Dove Medical Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Abelson, Mark, Eugene Protzko, Aron Shapiro, Ana Garces-Soldana, and Lyle Bowman. 2007. A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 1(2): 177-182.

Abstract

Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an ophthalmic formulation of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite® (AzaSite™, InSite Vision, Alameda CA, USA) and demonstrate equivalence with 0.3% tobramycin ophthalmic solution, USP, for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis as defined by the resolution of clinical signs and the eradication of pathogens. Design: Prospective, randomized, active-controlled, double-masked, phase 3 trial conducted at 47 US sites between 6 August 2004 and 6 October 2005. Participants: Subjects aged 1 year or older with diagnosis of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Methods: Bacteriologically confirmed participants received either 1% azithromycin in Dura-Site (n = 159) or tobramycin (n = 157). Masked study medications were dosed 4 times a day for 5 days. Participants in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group were dosed twice a day with active drug on days 1 and 2 and once daily on days 3 through 5. The other doses were vehicle. Clinical signs and bacterial cultures were evaluated at visit 3 (day 6 + 1). Results: Clinical resolution was observed in 79.9% of participants in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group, as compared with 78.3% of those in the tobramycin group (95% CI: −7.4–10.5). Bacterial eradication was 88.1% in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group vs 94.3% in the tobramycin group (95% CI: −12.4–0.0). Analyses of resistance confirmed that 1% azithromycin in DuraSite eradicated Staphylococci and Streptococci strains that are commonly resistant to azithromycin, erythromycin, and fluoroquinolones. Conclusions: The efficacy of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite and tobramycin are equivalent; however, this formulation of azithromycin also permits effective dosing intervals of twice a day on days 1 and 2 followed by once daily on the last 3 days of therapy, for a total of 65% fewer doses. In vitro, the killing spectrum of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite appears to be enhanced relative to 1% azithromycin without DuraSite.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

azithromycin, bacterial conjunctivitis, tobramycin, ophthalmic solution

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories