Publication:
Health Care Fraud Liability for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers

Thumbnail Image

Date

2011

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Jennifer Williams, Health Care Fraud Liability for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers (April 2011).

Research Data

Abstract

Fraud is an increasingly expensive cost to the health care industry, and the regulatory and prosecutorial focus during the fast few decades have focused on health care fraud by pharmaceutical manufacturers. This paper provides an overview of the current statutory and judicial environment. First, it examines some of the industry practices for which pharmaceutical companies may be held liable for fraud (as well as some of the reasons these practices are problematic). It then gives an overview of the dual regime of the Medicare and Medicaid Anti-Kickback Statute and the False Claims Act (“FCA”), as well as some of the other guidance documents available to pharmaceutical manufacturers. It also explores the relevant case history that has shaped liability—for health care providers and suppliers in general and for drug companies in particular—under the Anti-Kickback Statute and the FCA. The 2009 settlement between Pfizer and the government provides a useful example of the present state of affairs for pharmaceutical companies. Finally, the paper concludes with a brief overview of the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit (and the newly implemented coverage gap discount program), which may result in increasing liability for pharmaceutical manufacturers in the future.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories