Publication:
PEREZ v. WYETH LABORATORIES INC. & THE WISDOM OF AN ADVERTISING EXCEPTION TO THE LEARNED INTERMEDIARY RULE

Thumbnail Image

Date

2000

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

PEREZ v. WYETH LABORATORIES INC. & THE WISDOM OF AN ADVERTISING EXCEPTION TO THE LEARNED INTERMEDIARY RULE (2000 Third Year Paper)

Research Data

Abstract

On August 9, 1999, the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued the first high-level court opinion to recognize a direct-to-consumer ("DTC") advertising exception to the learned intermediary rule. Although the manufacturer in Perez v. Wyeth Lab. Inc. had satisfied its duty to provide medical professionals with full warnings, the court held that the usual protection offered by the learned intermediary rule was not automatically available since the manufacturer had engaged in DTC advertising. Because the manufacturer's advertising campaign on television and in women's magazines had failed to warn of certain side effects and complications attendant to removal of its Norplant implants, the court held that the question of whether inadequate warnings constituted proximate cause should be submitted to a jury.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Food and Drug Law, DTC, Norplant, implants, advertising, Perez, Wyeth Lab, learned intermediary rule

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories