Publication:
Placebo or Panacea: The FDA's Rejection of ImClone's Erbitux Licensing Application

Thumbnail Image

Date

2003

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Placebo or Panacea: The FDA's Rejection of ImClone's Erbitux Licensing Application (2003 Third Year Paper)

Research Data

Abstract

This paper draws upon the media reports, congressional hearing testimony, and company press releases to recount events surrounding the FDA’s refusal to issue a license to ImClone’s cancer drug Erbitux, late in 2001. Erbitux was granted fast-track status by FDA, and was evaluated under the agency’s accelerated approval process. Despite hype about the drug’s effectiveness in fighting certain types of cancer, the FDA found numerous and considerable problems with the licensing application, and in particular with the conduct and documentation of the main registration trial. The paper discusses the possibility that ImClone’s public statements may have misled investors, and the ability of the FDA and the SEC to oversee these disclosures. Finally, recent changes in the FDA approval process are addressed, as well as the current state of ImClone’s continuing attempts to gain licensing approval for Erbitux.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Food and Drug Law, ImClone, Erbitux, Waksal, insider trading, public disclosure, licensing application, biologics

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories