Publication: Placebo or Panacea: The FDA's Rejection of ImClone's Erbitux Licensing Application
Open/View Files
Date
2003
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Placebo or Panacea: The FDA's Rejection of ImClone's Erbitux Licensing Application (2003 Third Year Paper)
Research Data
Abstract
This paper draws upon the media reports, congressional hearing testimony, and company press releases to recount events surrounding the FDA’s refusal to issue a license to ImClone’s cancer drug Erbitux, late in 2001. Erbitux was granted fast-track status by FDA, and was evaluated under the agency’s accelerated approval process. Despite hype about the drug’s effectiveness in fighting certain types of cancer, the FDA found numerous and considerable problems with the licensing application, and in particular with the conduct and documentation of the main registration trial. The paper discusses the possibility that ImClone’s public statements may have misled investors, and the ability of the FDA and the SEC to oversee these disclosures. Finally, recent changes in the FDA approval process are addressed, as well as the current state of ImClone’s continuing attempts to gain licensing approval for Erbitux.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Food and Drug Law, ImClone, Erbitux, Waksal, insider trading, public disclosure, licensing application, biologics
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service