Publication:
The Future of Gene Patenting and the Biotechnology Industry after Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al

Thumbnail Image

Date

2010

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Caitlyn Ross, The Future of Gene Patenting and the Biotechnology Industry after Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al (April 2010).

Research Data

Abstract

The recent decision by Judge Sweet in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al has the potential to dramatically alter the landscape of pharmaceutical research in the United States. As more companies use genetic data and research to tailor drugs to specific individuals, gene patents have become a tool to insure long-term profitability. While the district court’s decision will be tested on appeal, the industry must face the possibility that gene patents may be curtailed or even eliminated. Certainly biotechnology research will encounter greater public scrutiny as the case moves forward.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories