Publication: The Future of Gene Patenting and the Biotechnology Industry after Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al
Open/View Files
Date
2010
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Caitlyn Ross, The Future of Gene Patenting and the Biotechnology Industry after Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al (April 2010).
Research Data
Abstract
The recent decision by Judge Sweet in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al has the potential to dramatically alter the landscape of pharmaceutical research in the United States. As more companies use genetic data and research to tailor drugs to specific individuals, gene patents have become a tool to insure long-term profitability. While the district court’s decision will be tested on appeal, the industry must face the possibility that gene patents may be curtailed or even eliminated. Certainly biotechnology research will encounter greater public scrutiny as the case moves forward.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service