Publication: The National Childhood Vaccine Act
No Thumbnail Available
Open/View Files
Date
1994
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
The National Childhood Vaccine Act (1994 Third Year Paper)
Research Data
Abstract
Prior to passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Act in November 1986, manufacturers could be held strictly liable in tort for vaccine-related injuries, a lamentable situation which allegedly caused increasing prices, discontinuation of childhood vaccine production, and a reduction in vaccine innovation.2 To solve this "liability crisis"--which industry officials, legal commentators, and policymakers contended had plagued the vaccine industry since the late 1960s--Congress enacted a law which eschews state tort law as a compensatory mechanism, and instead shifts the product liability burden from manufacturers to a public National Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund. While this innovation fairly compensates the innocent victims of our compulsory vaccination laws, it assumed that the opponents of strict liability had correctly explained why vaccines were being removed from the market; if this assumption was erroneous, the pre-existing manufacturer tort liability regime should have been left intact, thereby preserving market incentives for investment in product innovation and additional safety.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Food and Drug Law, National Childhood Vaccine Act, mandatory vaccination, liability
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service