Publication:

Estimating Partisan Bias of the Electoral College Under Proposed Changes in Elector Apportionment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2013

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Thomas, A. C., Andrew Gelman, Gary King, and Jonathan N. Katz. 2013. “Estimating Partisan Bias of the Electoral College Under Proposed Changes in Elector Apportionment.” Statistics, Politics and Policy 4 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1515/spp-2012-0001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/spp-2012-0001.

Abstract

In the election for President of the United States, the Electoral College is the body whose members vote to elect the President directly. Each state sends a number of delegates equal to its total number of representatives and senators in Congress; all but two states (Nebraska and Maine) assign electors pledged to the candidate that wins the state's plurality vote. We investigate the effect on presidential elections if states were to assign their electoral votes according to results in each congressional district,and conclude that the direct popular vote and the current electoral college are both substantially fairer compared to those alternatives where states would have divided their electoral votes by congressional district.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories