Publication:
Sufficient Statistics for Welfare Analysis: A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods

Thumbnail Image

Date

2009

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Annual Reviews
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Chetty, Raj. 2009. Sufficient statistics for welfare analysis: a bridge between structural and reduced-form methods. Annual Review of Economics 1:451-488.

Research Data

Abstract

The debate between structural and reduced-form approaches has generated substantial controversy in applied economics. This article reviews a recent literature in public economics that combines the advantages of reduced-form strategies—transparent and credible identification—with an important advantage of structural models—the ability to make predictions about counterfactual outcomes and welfare. This literature has developed formulas for the welfare consequences of various policies that are functions of reduced-form elasticities rather than structural primitives. I present a general framework that shows how many policy questions can be answered by estimating a small set of sufficient statistics using program-evaluation methods. I use this framework to synthesize the modern literature on taxation, social insurance, and behavioral welfare economics. Finally, I discuss problems in macroeconomics, labor, development, and industrial organization that could be tackled using the sufficient statistic approach.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

program evalutation, treatment effects, public economics, taxation, social insurance

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories