DASH
Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Browse DASH
DASH Stories
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  3. SPH Scholarly Articles
  4. Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open/View files
3411304.pdf (708.71 KB)
Date
2012
Author(s)
de Jong, Marcus C.
Genders, Tessa S. S.
van Geuns, Robert-Jan
Moelker, Adriaan
DOI
10.1007/s00330-012-2434-1
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
de Jong, Marcus C., Tessa S. S. Genders, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Adriaan Moelker, and M. G. Myriam Hunink. 2012. Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Radiology 22(9): 1881-1895.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine and compare the diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using conventional coronary angiography (CCA) as the reference standard. Methods: We searched Medline and Embase for literature that evaluated stress MPI for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced echocardiography (ECHO), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). Results: All pooled analyses were based on random effects models. Articles on MRI yielded a total of 2,970 patients from 28 studies, articles on ECHO yielded a sample size of 795 from 10 studies, articles on SPECT yielded 1,323 from 13 studies. For CAD defined as either at least 50 %, at least 70 % or at least 75 % lumen diameter reduction on CCA, the natural logarithms of the diagnostic odds ratio (lnDOR) for MRI (3.63; 95 % CI 3.26–4.00) was significantly higher compared to that of SPECT (2.76; 95 % CI 2.28–3.25; P = 0.006) and that of ECHO (2.83; 95 % CI 2.29–3.37; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the lnDOR of SPECT and ECHO (P = 0.52). Conclusion: Our results suggest that MRI is superior for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with ECHO and SPECT. ECHO and SPECT demonstrated similar diagnostic performance.
Other Available Sources
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411304/pdf/
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service
URI
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10576042
Collection
SPH Scholarly Articles
Metrics
Repository logo
  • CONTACT US
  • OSRDS
  • ABOUT DASH
  • DEPOSITING TO DASH
  • TERMS OF USE
  • REQUEST A WAIVER
  • TAKE DOWN POLICY
  • NAME CHANGE POLICY
  • HARVARD OA POLICIES
  • DASH SUBMITTER AGREEMENT
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
Creative Commons License BY
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Except where otherwise noted, this work is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which allows anyone to share and adapt our material as long as proper attribution is given.
For details and exceptions, see the Harvard Library Copyright Policy
©2024 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.