Publication:
Biomarkers of Sarcopenia in Clinical Trials—Recommendations from the International Working Group on Sarcopenia

Thumbnail Image

Date

2012

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer-Verlag
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Cesari, Matteo, Roger A. Fielding, Marco Pahor, Bret Goodpaster, Marc Hellerstein, Gabor A. Van Kan, Stefan D. Anker, et al. 2012. Biomarkers of sarcopenia in clinical trials—recommendations from the International Working Group on Sarcopenia. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle 3(3): 181-190.

Research Data

Abstract

Sarcopenia, the age-related skeletal muscle decline, is associated with relevant clinical and socioeconomic negative outcomes in older persons. The study of this phenomenon and the development of preventive/therapeutic strategies represent public health priorities. The present document reports the results of a recent meeting of the International Working Group on Sarcopenia (a task force consisting of geriatricians and scientists from academia and industry) held on June 7–8, 2011 in Toulouse (France). The meeting was specifically focused at gaining knowledge on the currently available biomarkers (functional, biological, or imaging-related) that could be utilized in clinical trials of sarcopenia and considered the most reliable and promising to evaluate age-related modifications of skeletal muscle. Specific recommendations about the assessment of aging skeletal muscle in older people and the optimal methodological design of studies on sarcopenia were also discussed and finalized. Although the study of skeletal muscle decline is still in a very preliminary phase, the potential great benefits derived from a better understanding and treatment of this condition should encourage research on sarcopenia. However, the reasonable uncertainties (derived from exploring a novel field and the exponential acceleration of scientific progress) require the adoption of a cautious and comprehensive approach to the subject.

Description

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories