Publication:
Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolic events in women taking progestin-only contraception: a meta-analysis

Thumbnail Image

Date

2012

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Mantha, S, R Karp, V Raghavan, N Terrin, K A Bauer, and J I Zwicker. 2012. Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolic events in women taking progestin-only contraception: a meta-analysis. British Medical Journal 345:e4944.

Research Data

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolic events associated with the use of progestin-only contraception and whether that risk differs with the mode of drug delivery (oral, intrauterine, or depot injection). Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Data sources: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant reviews. Study selection: Randomised controlled trials and case-control, cohort, and cross sectional studies with venous thromboembolic outcome for progestin-only contraception reported relative to a non-hormone comparator group. Data extraction: Data were extracted by two independent investigators, and consensus for inclusion was reached after assessment by additional investigators. Results: Among the 2022 unique references identified by all searches, eight observational studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. A total of 147 women across all studies were diagnosed with a venous thromboembolic event while taking progestin-only contraception, and the summary measure for the adjusted relative risk of a venous thromboembolic episode for users versus non-users of a progestin-only contraceptive was, based on the random effects model, 1.03 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.39). Subgroup analysis confirmed there was no association between venous thromboembolic risk and progestin-only pills (relative risk 0.90 (0.57 to 1.45)) or a progestin intrauterine device (0.61 (0.24 to 1.53)). The relative risk of a venous thromboembolic event for users of an injectable progestin versus non-users was 2.67 (1.29 to 5.53). Conclusions: Published data assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in women prescribed progestin-only contraception are limited. In this meta-analysis of eight observational studies, the use of progestin-only contraception was not associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism compared with non-users of hormonal contraception. The potential association between injectable progestins and thrombosis requires further study.

Description

Keywords

Clinical Trials (Epidemiology), Contraception, Drugs: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reproductive Medicine, Venous Thromboembolism, Sexual Health, Internet

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories