Publication:
An exploratory study contrasting high- and low-ability students' word problem solving: The role of schema-based instruction.

Thumbnail Image

Date

2012

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Jitendra, Asha K., and Jon R. Star. 2012. An exploratory study contrasting high- and low-ability students' word problem solving: The role of schema-based instruction. Learning and Individual Differences 22, no. 1: 151-158.

Research Data

Abstract

This study evaluated whether schema-based instruction (SBI), a promising method for teaching students to represent and solve mathematical word problems, impacted the learning of percent word problems. Of particular interest was the extent that SBI improved high- and low-achieving students' learning and to a lesser degree on the indirect effect of SBI on transfer to novel problems, as compared to a business as usual control condition. Seventy 7th grade students in four classrooms (one high- and one low-achieving class in both the SBI and control conditions) participated in the study. Results indicate a significant treatment by achievement level interaction, such that SBI had a greater impact on high-achieving students' problem solving scores. However, findings did not support transfer effects of SBI for high-achieving students. Implications for improving the problem-solving performance of low achievers are discussed.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories

Story
An exploratory study contrasting high- and… : DASH Story 2013-08-30
Curriculum developer for Bridge International Academies, a network of ultra low-cost schools in the developing world. This paper directly impacted how we think about low-achieving pupils and word problems.