Publication:
Assessment of axial bone rigidity in rats with metabolic diseases using CT-based structural rigidity analysis

Thumbnail Image

Date

2012

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Smith, M. D., S. Baldassarri, L. Anez-Bustillos, A. Tseng, V. Entezari, D. Zurakowski, B. D. Snyder, and A. Nazarian. 2012. Assessment of axial bone rigidity in rats with metabolic diseases using CT-based structural rigidity analysis. Bone & Joint Research 1(2): 13-19.

Research Data

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to assess the correlation of CT-based structural rigidity analysis with mechanically determined axial rigidity in normal and metabolically diseased rat bone. Methods: A total of 30 rats were divided equally into normal, ovariectomized, and partially nephrectomized groups. Cortical and trabecular bone segments from each animal underwent micro-CT to assess their average and minimum axial rigidities using structural rigidity analysis. Following imaging, all specimens were subjected to uniaxial compression and assessment of mechanically-derived axial rigidity. Results: The average structural rigidity-based axial rigidity was well correlated with the average mechanically-derived axial rigidity results (R\(^2\) = 0.74). This correlation improved significantly (p < 0.0001) when the CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis (CTRA) minimum axial rigidity was correlated to the mechanically-derived minimum axial rigidity results (R\(^2\) = 0.84). Tests of slopes in the mixed model regression analysis indicated a significantly steeper slope for the average axial rigidity compared with the minimum axial rigidity (p = 0.028) and a significant difference in the intercepts (p = 0.022). The CTRA average and minimum axial rigidities were correlated with the mechanically-derived average and minimum axial rigidities using paired t-test analysis (p = 0.37 and p = 0.18, respectively). Conclusions: In summary, the results of this study suggest that structural rigidity analysis of micro-CT data can be used to accurately and quantitatively measure the axial rigidity of bones with metabolic pathologies in an experimental rat model. It appears that minimum axial rigidity is a better model for measuring bone rigidity than average axial rigidity.

Description

Keywords

Fracture Risk, Bone, Structural Rigidity, Metabolic Bone Disease, Computed Tomography, Rat Model, Ctra, Fracture risk, Structural rigidity, Metabolic bone disease, Computed tomography, Rat model, CTRA

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories