Publication: Factors Associated with Self-Reported Repeat HIV Testing after a Negative Result in Durban, South Africa
Open/View Files
Date
2013
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Regan, Susan, Elena Losina, Senica Chetty, Janet Giddy, Rochelle P. Walensky, Douglas Ross, Helga Holst, Jeffrey N. Katz, Kenneth A. Freedberg, and Ingrid V. Bassett. 2013. Factors associated with self-reported repeat hiv testing after a negative result in durban, south africa. PLoS ONE 8(4): e62362.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: Routine screening for HIV infection leads to early detection and treatment. We examined patient characteristics associated with repeated screening in a high prevalence country. Methods: We analyzed data from a cohort of 5,229 adults presenting for rapid HIV testing in the outpatient departments of 2 South African hospitals from November 2006 to August 2010. Patients were eligible if they were ≥18 years, reported no previous diagnosis with HIV infection, and not pregnant. Before testing, participants completed a questionnaire including gender, age, HIV testing history, health status, and knowledge about HIV and acquaintances with HIV. Enrollment HIV test results and CD4 counts were abstracted from the medical record. We present prevalence of HIV infection and median CD4 counts by HIV testing history (first-time vs. repeat). We estimated adjusted relative risks (ARR’s) for repeat testing by demographics, health status, and knowledge of HIV and others with HIV in a generalized linear model. Results: Of 4,877 participants with HIV test results available, 26% (N = 1258) were repeat testers. Repeat testers were less likely than first-time testers to be HIV-infected (34% vs. 54%, p<0.001). Median CD4 count was higher among repeat than first-time testers (201/uL vs. 147/uL, p<0.001). Among those HIV negative at enrollment (N = 2,499), repeat testing was more common among those with family or friends living with HIV (ARR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.33–1.68), women (ARR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11–1.40), and those self-reporting very good health (ARR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12–1.45). Conclusions: In this high prevalence setting, repeat testing was common among those undergoing HIV screening, and was associated with female sex, lower prevalence of HIV infection, and higher CD4 counts at diagnosis.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Medicine, Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology, Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Global Health, Infectious Diseases, Viral Diseases, HIV, HIV diagnosis and management, HIV epidemiology, Infectious Disease Control, Primary Care, Public Health, Behavioral and Social Aspects of Health, Health Screening, Social and Behavioral Sciences
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service