Publication: Exploiting Plaintiffs Through Settlement: Divide and Conquer
Open/View Files
Date
2008
Authors
Published Version
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Mohr
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Yeon-Koo Che & Kathryn E. Spier, Exploiting Plaintiffs Through Settlement: Divide and Conquer, 164 J. Inst. & Theoretical Econ. 4 (2008).
Research Data
Abstract
This paper considers settlement negotiations between a single defendant and N plaintiffs when there are Fixed costs of litigation. When making simultaneous take-it-or-leave-it offers to the plaintiffs, the defendant adopts a divide and conquer strategy. Plaintiffs settle their claims for less than they are jointly worth. The problem is worse when N is larger, the offers are sequential, and the plaintiffs make offers instead. Although divide and conquer strategies dilute the defendant's incentives, they increase the settlement rate and reduce litigation spending. Plaintiffs can raise their joint payoff through transfer payments, voting rules, and covenants not to accept discriminatory offers.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
litigation, settlement, class actions, bargaining, divide and conquer, contracting with externalities
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles (OAP), as set forth at Terms of Service