Publication: The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives
Loading...
Date
2006
Authors
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Steven M. Shavell, The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives, 35 J. Legal Stud. 1 (2006).
Abstract
The appeals process—whereby litigants can have decisions of adjudicators reviewed by a higher authority—is a general feature of formal legal systems (and of many private decision‐making procedures). The appeals process leads to the making of better decisions because it constitutes a threat to adjudicators whose decisions would deviate too much from socially desirable ones. Further, it yields this benefit without absorbing resources to the extent that adjudicators can anticipate when appeals would occur and would want to make decisions to forestall the actual occurrence of appeals.
Description
Research Data
Keywords
Terms of Use
Metadata Only