Publication:
Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle

Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2013

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Schneps, Matthew H., Jenny M. Thomson, Gerhard Sonnert, Marc Pomplun, Chen Chen, and Amanda Heffner-Wong. 2013. “Shorter Lines Facilitate Reading in Those Who Struggle.” PLoS ONE 8 (8): e71161. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071161.

Abstract

People with dyslexia, who ordinarily struggle to read, sometimes remark that reading is easier when e-readers are used. Here, we used eye tracking to observe high school students with dyslexia as they read using these devices. Among the factors investigated, we found that reading using a small device resulted in substantial benefits, improving reading speeds by 27%, reducing the number of fixations by 11%, and importantly, reducing the number of regressive saccades by more than a factor of 2, with no cost to comprehension. Given that an expected trade-off between horizontal and vertical regression was not observed when line lengths were altered, we speculate that these effects occur because sluggish attention spreads perception to the left as the gaze shifts during reading. Short lines eliminate crowded text to the left, reducing regression. The effects of attention modulation by the hand, and of increased letter spacing to reduce crowding, were also found to modulate the oculomotor dynamics in reading, but whether these factors resulted in benefits or costs depended on characteristics, such as visual attention span, that varied within our sample.

Description

Keywords

Biology, Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cognition, Learning and Memory, Sensory Perception, Engineering, Human Factors Engineering, Man Computer Interface, Medicine, Mental Health, Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Learning, Psychophysics, Science Policy, Science Education, Technology Development, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Economics, Human Capital, Economics of Training and Education, Literacy

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories