Publication:

Extracting Physician Group Intelligence from Electronic Health Records to Support Evidence Based Medicine

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2013

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Weber, Griffin M., and Isaac S. Kohane. 2013. “Extracting Physician Group Intelligence from Electronic Health Records to Support Evidence Based Medicine.” PLoS ONE 8 (5): e64933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064933.

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine employs expert opinion and clinical data to inform clinical decision making. The objective of this study is to determine whether it is possible to complement these sources of evidence with information about physician “group intelligence” that exists in electronic health records. Specifically, we measured laboratory test “repeat intervals”, defined as the amount of time it takes for a physician to repeat a test that was previously ordered for the same patient. Our assumption is that while the result of a test is a direct measure of one marker of a patient's health, the physician's decision to order the test is based on multiple factors including past experience, available treatment options, and information about the patient that might not be coded in the electronic health record. By examining repeat intervals in aggregate over large numbers of patients, we show that it is possible to 1) determine what laboratory test results physicians consider “normal”, 2) identify subpopulations of patients that deviate from the norm, and 3) identify situations where laboratory tests are over-ordered. We used laboratory tests as just one example of how physician group intelligence can be used to support evidence based medicine in a way that is automated and continually updated.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Biology, Computational Biology, Population Modeling, Computer Science, Information Technology, Databases, Medicine, Diagnostic Medicine, Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Test Evaluation, Non-Clinical Medicine, Health Care Policy, Health Risk Analysis, Health Statistics, Quality of Care, Screening Guidelines, Treatment Guidelines, Health Care Providers, Physicians, Health Economics, Cost Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Care Quality, Health Informatics, Health Services Research

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories