Publication:
Quantitative Methods and Ethics

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2013

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Rosnow, Ralph L., and Robert Rosenthal. 2013. Quantitative Methods and Ethics. In The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology Vol. 1, ed. Todd D. Little. New York: OUP.

Research Data

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to provide a context for thinking about the role of ethics in quantitative methodology.We begin by reviewing the sweep of events that led to the creation and expansion of legal and professional rules for the protection of research subjects and society against unethical research. The risk–benefit approach has served as an instrument of prior control by institutional review boards. After discussing the nature of that approach,we sketch a model of the costs and utilities of the “doing” and “not doing” of research.We illustrate some implications of the expanded model for particular data analytic and reporting practices.We then outline a 5 × 5 matrix of general ethical standards crossed with general data analytic and reporting standards to encourage thinking about opportunities to address quantitative methodological problems in ways that may have mutual ethical and substantive rewards. Finally,we discuss such an opportunity in the context of problems associated with risk statistics that tend to exaggerate the absolute effects of therapeutic interventions in randomized trials.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Accountability, American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics Code, Belmont Report, ethical principles, health statistics, institutional review board (IRB), moral dilemmas, Nuernberg (Nuremberg) Code, quantitative methodology, risk–benefit assessment, statistical illiteracy, transparency, volunteer bias

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories