Publication:
Reliability of Measurement in Psychology: From Spearman-Brown to Maximal Reliability

Thumbnail Image

Date

1996

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Psychological Association
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Rosenthal, Robert, Heng Li and Donald B. Rubin. 1996. "Reliability of Measurement in Psychology: From Spearman-Brown to Maximal Reliability." Psychological Methods 1, No. 1: 98-107.

Research Data

Abstract

The authors extend the usual approach to the assessment of test or rater reliability to situations that have previously not been appropriate for the application of this standard (Spearman-Brown) approach. Specifically, the authors (a) provide an accurate overall estimate of the reliability of a test (or a panel of raters) comprising 2 or more different kinds of items (or raters), a quite common situation, and (b) provide a simple procedure for constructing the overall instrument when it comprises 2 or more kinds of items, judges, or raters, each with its own costs and its own reliabilities.

Description

Other Available Sources

Keywords

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories