Publication: Reliability of Measurement in Psychology: From Spearman-Brown to Maximal Reliability
Date
1996
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Psychological Association
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Rosenthal, Robert, Heng Li and Donald B. Rubin. 1996. "Reliability of Measurement in Psychology: From Spearman-Brown to Maximal Reliability." Psychological Methods 1, No. 1: 98-107.
Research Data
Abstract
The authors extend the usual approach to the assessment of test or rater reliability to situations that have previously not been appropriate for the application of this standard (Spearman-Brown) approach. Specifically, the authors (a) provide an accurate overall estimate of the reliability of a test (or a panel of raters) comprising 2 or more different kinds of items (or raters), a quite common situation, and (b) provide a simple procedure for constructing the overall instrument when it comprises 2 or more kinds of items, judges, or raters, each with its own costs and its own reliabilities.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Terms of Use
Metadata Only